Category Archives: Management

#73 When vendor management turns messy

Send to Kindle

Vendors are hired for many reasons. They provide a specialized skill, they help deal with business cycles, and outsourcing helps organizations focus on core, mission critical items.

Why do vendor engagements not work out the way they are supposed to? Here is a short list of things to check for:

  • Did either party misrepresent their capabilities? Both parties have to provide outputs for the other to be successful. Just because a vendor is hired does not mean a client has no work or responsibilities.
  • Did the scope change when no one was looking? This is the classic Camel’s nose problem. It starts as a small, harmless request, then balloons into a major commitment and unwritten contract.
  • Did either party do things to undermine trust? Not keeping promises is a big one, I’d start there. This usually happens when people forget what promises were made. See next point.
  • Who is reading the Statement of Work and ensuring that execution is aligned to the spirit and letter of that document? Once it is signed, that document seems to gather dust while people make up the rules and scope as they go along.
  • Is everyone in it for the long haul? Even if it is a small project, there will be more projects later. Even if there are no projects, there is word of mouth and referrals to worry about. For both client and vendor.
  • Does everyone realize how much hard work goes into a successful engagement? This is not easy, but vendors and clients seem to make it more difficult with their sloppiness. This understanding comes from experience, but it can come earlier with proper training in both organizations.
  • Who is in charge of making sure the engagement is successful? Are they empowered? Do they have the freedom to hold other people within their organizations accountable?

This is not easy. Vendors are here to stay. Time to upgrade skills for both clients and vendors.

Share

#71 “Tell me” versus “Show me”

Send to Kindle

Showing” is always more powerful than “telling.” One way to implement this is to use the Iceberg Theory, a method of “minimalist writing.” This is because both methods add to clarity of communication. (But there are exceptions… as with guidelines in general)

The Iceberg Theory will work only if, to quote Hemingway, “the writer of the prose knows enough of what he is writing.”

You can (and should) take writing lessons. But if you know what you are talking about, and determine to say it in fewest possible words, without being obscure, you’ll have a leg up over your verbose co-workers, who have nothing to say, but use a lot of words to say it.

 

Share