Monthly Archives: March 2013

#85 What not to delegate

Send to Kindle

Some executives are famous for letting others do their “dirty work.” You know who they are in your organization. This approach could be used to send tough messages, probe for motives, or hide their hand till the last minute; without becoming the person to blame if conflict spreads. The messenger becomes the scapegoat.

Trouble is, people are quick to catch on, and they will take steps to counter this behavior. This invariably leads to drop in trust.

Executives (and senior managers and those in leadership positions) will do well to remember that the medium is the message. Nothing, absolutely nothing can change the fact that a policy issued by an executive has the force of law. The same uttering by a lowly individual contributor, no matter how intelligent, no matter how respected, no matter the logic and research, will not have the same impact. Because “the boss” has and always will carry the most weight in the organization.

Your options are to become the boss (and watch what you say very carefully) or frame up the script for the boss to deliver. The latter works well because of the corporate maxim, “If you want to prosper,  make your boss look good!” The latter strategy if done in a healthy win-win manner, will broaden your perspectives and prepare you for higher responsibilities.

While it is true that reducing workload for your boss is rewarded (another corporate maxim), communicating policy is not to be undertaken by anyone other than “the boss.”

Share

#84 Negotiating internal interfaces

Send to Kindle

To execute organization strategy, several internal functions have to collaborate. Marketing and Sales typically lead the charge (or they think they do), and Finance, IT, Manufacturing, and HR bring up the rear. Enlightened companies will challenge each internal function provide a competitive advantage. For example, if HR can hire top notch talent who have business acumen, and creativity to match, all internal functions will benefit and be firing on all cylinders.

Yet there seems to more harm done be “friendly fire” than by competitors efforts. This happens because internal functions do not negotiate among themselves to establish inputs and outputs, quality of those outputs, and Service Level Agreements. This results in bureaucracy, bottlenecks, and frustration. Not to mention higher costs of doing business, and lower productivity.

Different companies have different ways of doing business. For legacy reasons, or for other reasons. This means no out-of-the-box “standard” can be adopted and each company has to work out the inter-function interfaces to drive their business model.

For example, HR may take care of the recruitment process, soup to nuts, or the hiring manager may have to play an active role to ensure quality control. The latter happens because HR lacks the knowledge of the business. If HR determines that it must become a true partner and “trusted advisor” they will step up to guarantee quality, if they are overwhelmed by administrative duties or if they are in a complex, technical, fast moving business, they may take time to do so.

Similarly, in some organizations IT may be best suited to manage the systems infrastructure, leaving the business teams to take on analysis, design, prototyping, and proof of concept for applications. In other cases, IT may not be a competitive advantage, hence all such functions are outsourced or in the cloud.

Establish your organization’s place in a maturity model, then craft your interfaces between internal functions to execute your strategy.

Share